It has been said, “less is more代言人Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why？
  Is it possible to tell whether the left hand is more useful than is the right one? It would be ridiculous to argue that knowledge gained from experience outweighs that from books. In fact, both are vital and essential in human learning. Learning from books and learning from experience is just two hands of a human and two wings of a bird. Each plays its unique role.
  Learning from books is one of the most prevailing means adopted in schools and universities world around for spreading knowledge. Compared with learning from experience, learning from books is wider in range and deeper in contents. It is evident that there is no possibility for the contemporary people to experience what had happened in the past, people only can learn knowledge about the past through reading documents, scientific literature, literary books, and other written materials. Indeed, history and archeology depend heavily on learning from books.
  In addition to the limitation of age, space restrictions also make it imperative that people learn from books. It is hard, even implausible, for human beings to uncover the true face of the outer space and the deep sea bottom. For instance, the formidable, inaccessible, and hostile sea floor makes it rather hard for experts to dive into the sea to experience the alien world in person. The majority of the public can only obtain the knowledge from reading, watching, or listening. As to the information about the remote solar system or beyond, learning from experience sounds rather naïve. Landing on the moon might be fascinatingly sensuous. But how much hazard humans have realized that might entail to the astronomers? If people want to discover the mars, other stars, or quasars, then who can be the first to experience the voyage in person?
  Considering the spatiotemporal limitations, the current technology makes it impossible for the public to learn a large volume of knowledge from experience. But this is not meant to indicate that learning from experience is less important. Quite on the contrary, learning from experience is essential under most circumstances and is rather efficient and effective.
  Some fundamental human skills must be learnt from experience whereas the knowledge from books is only auxiliary. No one learns playing tennis merely from reading tennis books. Swimming is another telling case. Even one has read a colossal volume of books concerning swimming, never can he or she master the arts of swimming until he or she has exercised thousands of times. Neither can one learn a foreign language well without direct experience of using the language. Dictionary can tell the meaning of each word, but only the real practical use of it makes it possible for learners to have a better command over the language. Countless are the examples.
Therefore, both learning from the book and learning from the experiences are critical in pushing the boundaries of human understanding. Under certain conditions, it makes a sense to say that one way is better or more important than the other. Nevertheless without defining the exact case, by no means (On no account) can one conclude that learning from books is more vital than learning from experience, or vice versa.

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。