调查取证申请书推翻模板
    Motion to Suppress Warrant Application.
    Introduction.
    The Defendant, [Defendant's Name], hereby moves this Court to suppress the warrant application and all evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant issued on [Date of Warrant]. The Defendant asserts that the warrant application was insufficient to establish probable cause and that the warrant was therefore unlawfully issued.
    Legal Standard.
    The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. A warrantless search is presumptively unreasonable, and the government bears the burden of proving that a warrantless search was justified by one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.
    One such exception is the probable cause exception. A warrant may be issued if the affiant demonstrates, under oath or affirmation, that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been or is being committed and that evidence of the crime is located at the place to be searched.
    Factual Background.
    The warrant application in this case was based on information provided by a confidential informant. The informant alleged that the Defendant was selling drugs out of his apartment. The informant provided the police with a detailed description of the Defendant's apartment and his alleged drug-selling activities.
    Argument.
    The Defendant contends that the warrant application was insufficient to establish probable cause because the informant's information was not sufficiently reliable. The informant was not known to the police and had not previously provided reliable information. Additionally, the informant's information was not corroborated by any other evidence.
    The Defendant further contends that the warrant was unlawfully issued because it was not supported by a neutral and detached magistrate. The magistrate who issued the warrant was the same magistrate who had previously issued a search warrant for another defendant who was allegedly involved in the same drug-selling operation as the Defendant.
    Conclusion.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant respectfully requests that this Court suppress the warrant application and all evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant.
    中文回答：
    调查取证申请书推翻申请。
    引言。
    被告人 [被告人姓名] 特此向本法院提出申请，要求推翻调查取证申请书及其根据 [日期] 签发的搜查令而获得的所有证据。被告人声称调查取证申请书不足以证明可能存在原因，因此搜查令非法签发。
    法律标准。
    《美国宪法修正案第四条》保障民众免受非合理的搜查和扣押。未经搜查令进行的搜查应推定为不合理的，政府有责任证明这种未经搜查令的搜查符合公认的搜查令要求例外情形的其中一种。
    可能的原则是其中一种例外情形。如果宣誓书作者证明存在可能的理由相信已经或正在实施犯罪且该犯罪的证据位于待搜查场所，则可以签发搜查令。
    案情背景。
    本案中的调查取证申请书基于保密线人提供的信息。线人声称被告人正在其公寓中贩卖。线人向警方提供了被告人公寓和其涉嫌活动的详细描述。
    辩论。
    被告人辩称，调查取证申请书不足以证明可能存在原因，因为线人的信息不够可靠。线人警方并不认识，且此前从未提供过可靠的信息。此外，线人的信息未得到任何其他证据的佐证。
    被告人还辩称，该搜查令是非法签发的，因为它没有得到公正、不偏袒的治安法官的支持。签发该搜查令的治安法官曾向另一名被告签发了搜查令，而该被告人涉嫌与被告人参与了同样的活动。
    结论。
    基于上述理由，被告人恭敬地请求本法院推翻调查取证申请书及其根据搜查令获得的所有证据。
>defendant

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。