A Customized Report for:
Report Sample
Date:
November 18, 2011
© 2009 CENTER FOR APPLIED COGNITIVE STUDIES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
pg 1Introduction
Individual’s Trait Scores Evidence of Response Set Bias
pg 2CONSULTANT’S REPORT
WORKPLACE BIG FIVE PROFILE™ 4.0pg 2pg 5reactive materials studies
pg 2Individual’s Item Responses Trait Capacity Report Summary
Trait Blends
pg 3© 2009 CENTER FOR APPLIED COGNITIVE STUDIES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
DEVELOPED BY:
PIERCE J. HOWARD, PHD
JANE MITCHELL HOWARD, MBA
The Consultant’s Report is intended to support the Consultant in his/her interpretation of the WorkPlace Big Five Profile Trait Report, Narrator Report and Trait Capacitor Report. It provides summary information from those reports, as well as additional information such as Item Responses, Response Set Bias, Consistency Indices, Trait Blends and detailed data for the Capacity Scores.
There are three sections to the Consultant’s Report: The first section contains the 5 supertrait scores and the 23 subtrait scores with consistency indices for each score of pure, situational or polarized. Regarding supertraits and subtraits, the consistency indices reflect how consistently an individual answers the questions. For supertraits, the consistency index is computed by the standard deviation
of the answers of all the questions related to that supertrait (after accommodating for inverted questions). For subtraits, the consistency index is determined through logical conditions based on the direction of the answers to the questions (after accommodating for inverted questions). For a subtrait to be scored pure, the individual must answer the questions purely in the direction of the subtrait score. In order for the subtrait to be scored as polarized, the individual must answer the questions in various directions. If the individual answers mostly, but not always, in one direction, the subtrait will be scored as situational. The logical conditions are documented in Appendix D of the Professional Manual 4.0.
The first section also contains Evidence of Response Set Bias. Most of the time, this will say “None.” If you see any of the other possible descriptions, please refer to the Professional Manual for guidance before interpreting the WorkPlace reports with your client.
The item responses are located at the end of the first section of the Consultant’s Report. These can be used along with Appendix A in the Professional Manual to advise a client of their responses to questions related to a specific subtrait. This is useful if your client questions a particular score.
The second section of the Consultant’s Report contains trait blends commonly used by consultants that have experience with the WorkPlace Big Five Profile. If one of the blends applies to your client (“True”), it is highlighted in brown. If the blend may apply to your client (“Somewhat True”), it is highlighted in blue. If the blend does not apply to your client (“False”), it is not highlighted (white). Finally, if your client receives a Trait Capacitor Report, there will be a third section included in the Consultant’s Report that contains the summary of Overall Capacity Scores for competencies. The Consultant’s Report will also include the breakdown of the Overall Capacity Score into shape, level, dispersion and coverage. If you would like a white paper on the description of these measures, contact the Center for Applied Cognitive Studies. In addition, you will find the Human Resource Optimization (HRO) Strategy for each of the competencies based on the Capacity Score and based on whether the
client performs high or low on the competency. Only the client and potentially the consultant will know the client’s performance of the competency, so the report includes the strategy for both high and low performance.
55**
Methodicalness
C5
65**Concentration C464*Drive
C339***Organization C273*Perfectionism C159**
Consolidation C
41**
Reserve
A4
28*Humility A355***Agreement A222*Others' Needs A136**
Accommodation A
73**
Scope
O442**Change O365*Complexity O274*Imagination O164**
Originality
O
25**
Tact
E6
66*Trust Of Others E542***Taking Charge E438***Activity Mode E326**Sociability E241***Warmth E140***
Extraversion E
67**
Rebound Time
N4
68**Interpretation N366**Intensity N255**Worry N164**
Need For Stability N
INDIVIDUAL'S TRAIT SCORES
NOTE: The Consistency Index is a continuum that reflects the degree to which this person answered all of the items for one trait with the same weighted response (a “Pure” trait), all the way to the other extreme, answering half the items weighted at one extreme, and half weighted at the other extreme (a “Polarized” trait).
*= Pure (extremely consistent)**= Situational (somewhat inconsistent)***= Polarized (extremely inconsistent)EVIDENCE OF RESPONSE SET BIAS: None
(or: Tendency to Agree, Tendency to Disagree, Tendency to be Indecisive, Tendency to Use Extremes, Tendency to Use Moderates, Tendency to Use a Response Category Repeatedly)THIS PERSON’S INDIVIDUAL ITEM RESPONSES:
+1
100.-190.
+280.
+170.
+260.
-250.
+140.
030.
-220.
+110.
-2
99.
+189.-179.-169.+259.+249.+239.-229.+219.+29.+198.-188.-178.068.-158.048.+138.+228.-118.+28.+2107.+197.-187.+277.+267.-157.+247.+137.+227.-117.-17.-2
106.
+296.086.+176.+266.+156.-146.+136.+226.-216.-16.+1105.+295.+285.-275.065.+255.-245.+235.025.+115.+25.+2104.-194.+184.+174.+164.+254.+144.-234.-124.+214.+24.-2
103.
+293.+283.-173.-163.-153.+243.+133.-123.+213.+23.-1102.-192.+182.+272.+162.+152.-242.+132.-222.+112.+12.+1101.+291.+181.+271.+261.-251.-141.-131.+121.+211.+11.
Natural tendency to come up with new ideas and combinations of
O+C-
One-person Think Tank
Absence of negative emotions and abundance of positive emotions is associated with the trait of always being happy
N-E+Naturally Happy Calm, outgoing, visionary, sufficiently tough, and focused--can handle most kinds of leadership demands
N-E+O+A=/-C+Natural Leader Tends to be either lower in trust, more concerned with details,and/or more focused on standards
E5-O4-C1+Micro-Management Tendency Relatively spontaneous and loves variety; tends to be more of a spender than a saver
O+C-
Kid-in-a-Candy-Store Tendency to feel anger with some frequency, yet not to express those feelings around others; would be helpful to learn appropriate ways to get such feelings expressed
N2+E6+A14+
Internalizer
Originality, extraversion, and spontaneity lead to frequent initiatives E+O+C-Initiator Resilience, comfort in the thick of the action, and open-mindedness are all three associated with various aspects of emotional intelligence
N-E+O+
High EQ Low reactivity, a solitary and reserved nature, and a typically cool demeanor typically result in others' having a harder time reading one's feelings and thoughts
N1234-E12-A4+
Hard to Read Likely to start a conversation directly or even bluntly (like a grizzly bear), but then to back off in consideration of others' feelings and points of view (like a teddy bear)
N1+3-E6-A1234+
Grizzly/Teddy Focusing both on others' needs and on accomplishing one's
priorities makes it likely this person could overpromise and have to work extra hard in order to deliver
A1+C+
Going the Extra Mile
Likely to have a keen sense of what others are feeling, as in finding it natural to "walk in another's moccasins"
N14+3-E15++6+A13++24+C35+Empathic
Extraverted, creative, aggressive, and focused persons tend to be dominant in most settings
E+O+A-C+Dominant    A take-charge nature coupled with moderate sociability and
accommodation makes it likely that this individual finds it natural to lead others in building consensus
E2=4+A=
Consensus Builder
Is equally likely to think up innovations as well as to embrace change initiated by others
O13+Change is My Friend    A tendency towards pessimism, caution, and solitude likely result in some reticence with respect to building and maintaining relationships
N3+E25-
Cautious in Relationships
Persons who fall naturally into the role of serving others tend to be reactive, outgoing, deferential, and spontaneous
N+E+A+C-Born to Serve Others Likely to exhibit, as well as value, high standards for beauty,design, art, appearance.
N-O++A+C+Aesthetic
TRAIT BLENDS COMMONLY USED IN INTERPRETATION AND FEEDBACK
Interpretation Guide:True
Somewhat True
False
DEFINITION:
BLENDS:
NAME:

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。