很多哲学家比如德里达,所说的“在场”是什么意思?
我为什么强调,presence是与时间紧密联系的,特别是与现时/现下(同时也意味着与语法中的现在时有紧密的关联),请参考下面引文(Derrida对于presence的论述,首先源自于他对Husserl的行文的精读和分析)。我再次强调,并不是市场上流通的术语翻译就是已然最完美,最合适,最准确的,如果先入为主地这样的设定了,那也没有什么可以多说了。也就是说,“在场”作为对presence的翻译一点都没有关注这个概念多层次上的运作。
Husserl: All our ideas about time spring from our experience of the present. That conscious experience is characterized by being intentional, by being toward something. We typically recognize three kinds of time: scientific, objective, Newtonian time, which we think of as being independent of ourselves and as independently verifiable; subjective time, in which events seem to move slower or faster; and phenomenological or intentional time, which is the fundamental experience on which the other concepts of time are based, from which the other concepts derive because the phenomenological present includes not only awareness of present phenomena (the present), but retention (awareness of that which is not present beca
use it no longer is—the past), and protention (awareness of that which is not present because it is about to be). The present is intentionality toward phenomena before us here, now. The past present intentionality toward phenomena that are not present but are with us and so must be past (that’s where the definition ofpast comes from). The future is present intentionality toward phenomena that also are present but are not with us (as the past is) and so must be the future, which will be (that’s where the definition of future comes from). Therefore, in their origins in our phenomenological experiences, the future and the past are parts of the present, conceptual phenomena held in the present, alongside actual phenomena, as phenomena no longer present and not yet present.
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198,我们将在24小时内删除。
发表评论