考研英语一历年完形填空真题
    说到词汇量，就免不了要背单词，这也是我们每个考研人都感到头疼的地方。大多数同学都有这样的体会，单词背了忘，忘了又背，做翻译阅读时，觉得很眼熟、很亲切，但就是想不起来，下文是我为你细心编辑整理的考研英语一历年完形填空真题，期望对你有所帮忙，更多内容，请点击相关栏目查看，感谢!
考研英语一历年完形填空真题1
    Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
    People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making individual decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that 1 the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by 2 factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big 3 was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samles of information they were working with. 4 , he theorised that a judge 5 of apperaring too soft
6 crime might be more likely to send someone to prison 7 he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day.
    To 8 this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the 9 of an applicant should not depend on the few others 10 randomly for interview during the same day, but Dr. Simonsoho suspected the truth was 11 .
    He studied the results of 9,323 MBA interviews 12 by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had 13 applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale 14 numerous factors into consideration. The scores were 15 used in conjunction with an applicant’s score on the Granduate Managent Adimssion Test, or GMAT, a standardized exam which is 16 out of 800 points, to make a decision on whether to accept him or her.
    Dr. Simonsoho found if the score of the previous candidate in a daily series of interviewees was 0.75 points or more higher than that of the one 17 that, then the score for the next applicant would 18 by an average of 0.075 points. This might sound small, but to 19 the effects of such a decrease a candidate could need 30 more GMAT points th
an would otherwise have been 20 .
    1. [A] grants [B]submits [C]transmits [D]delivers
    2. [A] minor [B]objective [C]crucial [D] external
    3. [A] issue [B]vision [C]picture [D]external
    4. [A] For example [B] On average [C]In principle [D]Above all
    5. [A] fond [B] fearful [C]capable [D] thoughtless
    6. [A] in [B] on [C] to [D] for
    7. [A] if [B] until [C] though [D] unless
    8. [A] promote [B] emphasize [C] share [D]success
    9. [A] decision [B] quality [C] status [D] success
    10. [A] chosen [B] studied [C] found [D] identified
    11. [A] exceptional [B] defensible [C] replaceable [D] otherwise
    12. [A] inspired [B] expressed [C] conducted [D] secured
replaceable
    13. [A] assigned [B] rated [C] matched [D] arranged
    14. [A] put [B] got [C] gave [D] took
    15. [A] instead [B] then [C] ever [D] rather
    16. [A] selected [B] passed [C] marked [D] introduced
    17. [A] before [B] after [C] above [D] below
    18. [A] jump [B] float [C] drop [D] fluctuate
    19. [A] achieve [B] undo [C] maintain [D] disregard
    20. [A] promising [B] possible [C] necessary [D] helpful
    考研英语一历年完形填空真题2
    Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark [A], [B], [C] or [D] on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
    Though not biologically related, friends are as related as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is 1 a study published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has 2 .
    The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted 3 1932 unique subjects which 4 pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both 5 .While 1% may seem 6 , it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, Most people do not even 7 their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who 8 our kin.
    The study 9 found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity in olfactory genes is difficult to explain, for now. 10 Perhaps, as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more 11 it. There could be many mechanisms working in tandem that 12 us in choosing geneticall
y similar friends 13 than functional kinship of being friends with 14 !One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving 15 than other genes. Studying this could help 16 why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major 17 factor.
    The findings do not simply corroborate peoples 18 to befriend those of similar 19 backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to 20 that all subjects, friends and strangers were taken from the same population. The team also controlled the data to check ancestry of subjects.

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。