2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试
英语(一)试题
Section I  Use of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)
Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is   1  a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has   2  .
The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted   3  1,932 unique subjects which   4  pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both   5  .
While 1% may seem   6  , it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even   7  their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who   8  our kin.”
  The study   9  found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now.   10  , as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more   11  it. There could be many mechanisms working together that   12  us in choosing genetically similar friends   13  “functional kinship” of being friends with   14  !
  One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving   15  than other genes. Studying this could help   16  why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major   17  factor.
The findings do not simply explain people’s   18  to befriend those of similar   19  backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to   20  that all subjects, friends and str
angers were taken from the same population. The team also controlled the data to check ancestry of subjects.
1.[A] what            [B] why            [C] how            [D] when
2.[A] defended        [B] concluded        [C] withdrawn      [D] advised
3.[A] for            [B] with            [C] by              [D] on
4.[A] separated        [B] sought        [C] compared      [D] connected
5.[A] tests            [B] objects        [C] samples          [D] examples
6.[A] insignificant    [B] unexpected    [C] unreliable      [D] incredible
7.[A] visit            [B] miss            [C] know          [D] seek
8.[A] surpass        [B] influence        [C] favor          [D] resemble
9.[A] again        [B] also            [C] instead          [D] thus
10.[A] Meanwhile    [B] Furthermore    [C] Likewise          [D] Perhaps
11.[A] about        [B] to            [C] from          [D] like
12.[A] limit            [B] observe        [C] confuse          [D] drive
13.[A] according to    [B] rather than    [C] regardless of      [D] along with
14.[A] chances        [B] responses        [C] benefits          [D] missions
15.[A] faster        [B] slower        [C] later              [D] earlier
16.[A] forecast        [B] remember    [C] express          [D] understand
17.[A] unpredictable    [B] contributory    [C] controllable      [D] disruptive
18.[A] tendency        [B] decision        [C] arrangement    [D] endeavor
19.[A] political        [B] religious        [C] ethnic          [D] economic
20.[A] see            [B] show        [C] prove          [D] tell
Section Reading Comprehension
Part A
Directions:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)
Text 1
King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they die in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles?
The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity.
It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs’ continuing popularity as heads of states. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.
Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today—embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.
polarised

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198,我们将在24小时内删除。