祝福+几篇论坛投稿至接收全过程



小弟我是做阵列信号处理及在雷达、声纳、通信领域的应用，目前在IEEE Trans/Letters，IEE Proceedings， Elsevier Signal Processing/Digital Signal Processing，电子学报，电子与信息学报，通信学报，航空学报等期刊都有过灌水的

记录。MS我们这个领域不是很讲究IF，周围的很少谈论IF的问题，我也偷偷查过我发表文章的期刊没有IF>1的。那些高IF大

牛们别笑话小弟哈。9月份以来又启动了新一轮灌水，在这里为自己祈祷一下，希望能再中个三五篇的。

1、IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering， 目前状态  Waiting for Potential Reviewer Assign
ment

2、IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters  目前状态  Awaiting Reviewer Scores

3、IEEE Signal Processing Letters  目前状态  In Peer Review

4、IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 目前状态  修改一次后又 Under Review

5、IET Signal Processing   目前状态  Under Review

6、IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation  目前状态  Under Review

7、IET Electronic Letters  目前状态  Under Review


8、Elsevier Signal Processing   目前状态  Required Reviews Completed

9、Science in China: F  目前状态  外审中

10、IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation  目前状态  上传中

小弟明年就该了，将来可能不再从事科研工作了，曾经在小木虫潜水，收获颇丰，现在把几篇文章的投稿经历拿出来给大家分享。。

Paper #1 我个人最欣赏的一篇paper。

1、2005年8月定稿后，投向了我们领域的Top One期刊，IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing。

2、2005年11月，收到Decision Letter。

  >Dear ..., 
  > 
  >I am writing to you concerning the above referenced manuscript, 
  >which you submitted to the  IEEE Transactions on Signal 
  >Processing.   
  > 
  >Based on the enclosed set of reviews, this manuscript has been   
  >rejected for publication (**See note below about attachments) 
  >because this paper is not sufficiently rigorous mathematically 
  >and is only supported on simulations. 
  > 
  >Thank you for considering  IEEE Transactions on Signal 
  >Processing  for publication of your work. 


  四个审稿人分别给了RQ，RQ，R，R的推荐，具体意见加起来有10几页，指出了里面的理论分析不是很严格，存在一些问题，但还是有一些内容得到了肯定。与老板讨论后，决定换一个期刊，改写一篇理论部分弱化的版本投稿。

3、经过近1年的修改，2006年10月，投至IEEETransactions on Antennas and Propagation。

4、2007年2月收到Decision Letter。这次的意见很糟糕，感觉审稿人完全不懂文章的内容。审稿人1说他曾经看过类似的

Idea，但却没有指出在哪篇文章或哪个期刊看过。审稿人2就更加奇怪，文章中方法的优点被他说成了缺点。。。尽管这样

，我还是认为这篇文章能在IEEE的期刊发表，被拒了两次，只能再投了。。


5、submitting2007年2月投稿至IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems。

6、2007年7月，收到审搞意见。意见不是很糟糕，一个审稿人给了具体的修改意见，另外两个审稿人肯定了其中贡献没有给修改意见。。。AE让修改后再投。。。

7、2007年9月再投稿至IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems。

8、2007年12月，收到Decision Letter。

Dear ...,

Your manuscript has been evaluated by the reviewers. I would like you to please examine the attached comments and make all neccesary changes to your manuscript prior to its resubmittal. Your manuscript is still in line to be published.


In resubmitting, please provide a detailed list of all changes made in the manuscript, keyed to the page and line numbers. Please be aware that the resubmitted manuscript must be uploaded within 180 days of this email, and that a manuscript returned later than that will be treated as a new (not revised) submission.

9、2007年12月，修改后投至IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems。

这次写了个Comment给AE。
Thank you very much for supervising the peer-review process for this manuscript. In the previous round of reviews, the main request is to shorten the manuscript.

This we have done: The abstract is reduced by 77% from 13 lines to 3 lines. The Introduction is shortened by 60% from 2.5 pages to 1 page. The theorem-proof structure is removed in Section V.
The bibliography is reduced by 54% from 39 to 18 entries. The entire manuscript (not counting the cover page) is reduced by 35% from 17 pages to 11 pages.

If the Associate Editor considers it appropriate, we would appreciate if the Associate Editor would
make a final decision on this manuscript himself, without another time-consuming round of peer reviews.

Many thanks and merry Christmas.

10、2007年12月，查看状态时发现变为 Manuscript Ready for Publication。

第一次外文投稿，从第一次投稿到最后接受，历时2年多，换了3个不同期刊，经历过投稿-拒绝-修改-投稿-拒绝-投稿-修改-修改-投稿-这么多过程，收获还是很多。。。

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Paper #2 自己独立完成的一篇，老板没有进行任何修改。发表在Elsevier Signal Processing上。

1、2007年5月，完成后投稿至Elsevier Signal Processing。

Dear ...,

Your submission entitled "..." has been received by Signal Processing.

2、2007年8月，收到Decision Letter

Dear ...,

Your manuscript has been reviewed and I am enclosing the reviewers' comments below. Based on the reviews, I have decided that the manuscript must undergo major revision before being resubmitted. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider the revised manuscript for publication.

编辑给了大改的机会，两个审稿意见都很到位，特别是第2个审稿人，用Word写了足足5页纸，包括我每一步公式的推导，和符号的错误等等都指出来了。。

3、按要求修改后2007年9月再次投到Elsevier Signal Processing。

4、2007年12月，收到Decision Letter

Dear ...,

Your manuscript has been reviewed and I am enclosing the reviewers' comments below.
Based on the reviews, I have decided that the manuscript must undergo major revision before being resubmitted. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider the revised manuscript for publication.

还是原来的审稿人，第一个已经没有意见了，第二个又发现了公式推导中的问题，让修改。

5、2008年1月，修改后投到Elsevier Signal Processing。

6、2008年4月，收到Decision Letter

Dear ...,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication subject to minor revisions. For your guidance, th
e reviewers' comments are appended below. Please submit a revised manuscript including a letter addressing the comments and indicating how the manuscript has been revised.

换了一个审稿人又审了一遍，这次还好，只有一些小的修改意见，AE给了小改。

7、2008年4月，小改后投到Elsevier Signal Processing。

8、2008年4月，Final Decision

Dear ...,

I am pleased to inform you that your paper "...." has been accepted for publication in Signal Processing.

这篇文章投稿到接收历时1年，经历了两次大改，一次小改，其中老板只是读了几遍文章而没有提修改意见，应该算是自己独立完成的第一篇paper.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Paper #3 最顺利的一篇paper. 发表在IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation

1、2008年2月，投稿至IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation

2、2008年5月，收到Decision Letter

Dear ...,

Thank you for submitting your paper to IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation. The referral process is now complete. I am pleased to say that the referees found your paper interesti
ng and worthy of publication. My decision is therefore to accept your paper subject to minor revisions.

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
A very interesting and well written paper. I have a few minor commentsbr />
Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
This paper desceribes ....., The idea is simple but seems to be effective.  I think it deserves publication, subject to some minor revisionsbr />
3个审稿人都只是提出了一些小的修改。。

3、2008年6月，修改后投稿至IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation

4、2008年6月，接受。


这篇文章从投稿接受只用了2个月，在我们这个领域内应该是比较快的了。

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

最后再谈一点体会。

在我们这个领域，如果有好idea的话，尽量投稿至IEEE/IEE的期刊。这些期刊的审稿相对都比较快(国内有些期刊的审稿周期实在是不敢恭维)，而且审稿意见都比较中肯，无论文章是否被接收，你都会有很大收获，这对科研人员的成长很有帮助。而我投向国内刊物的文章经常收到一些诸如"创新型一般，建议改投他刊"这样的很无奈的意见。。。

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。