如何撰写SCI文章，投稿交流用语及状态解释
第一部分：SCI文章的写作 对于没有写过英文的人来说，第一篇文章有些困难。关键还是在于要阅读大量的英文文献。在文章的写作上，最好不要自己造句子。说实在的，大多数中国学者的英文都不好，自己造句子，很可能是中式英语，老外看不懂。所以，写文章，要学会借鉴。也就多看英文文章，看到相关的句型，要做好笔记。要学会使用老外们用过的句型，拿来以后作些修改。 我一般都在写作前阅读大量的文章，一边阅读，一边把自己认为重要的句子分别copy到自己文章的各个部分，然后在写作时进行取舍。
1. Introduction部分，很多可能都是文献。要介绍自己研究的内容的一些相关知识。让大家知道你所研究领域现在的一些进展，以及自己研究的“新鲜”内容。
2. Materials and Methods比较好写，看看文献，应该有相同的内容可以参考，把这些内容来进行一些修改就可以了。
3. Results部分有些困难。这一部分是要自己造句较多的部分。但是也要尽量借用英语是母语的人所用的句型。个人研究的内容可能很多，要突出指出自己的研究重点。在这一部分，最好不要出现讨论方面的内容。
1. Introduction部分，很多可能都是文献。要介绍自己研究的内容的一些相关知识。让大家知道你所研究领域现在的一些进展，以及自己研究的“新鲜”内容。
2. Materials and Methods比较好写，看看文献，应该有相同的内容可以参考，把这些内容来进行一些修改就可以了。
3. Results部分有些困难。这一部分是要自己造句较多的部分。但是也要尽量借用英语是母语的人所用的句型。个人研究的内容可能很多，要突出指出自己的研究重点。在这一部分，最好不要出现讨论方面的内容。
4. 个人觉得最难写的部分是Discussion部分。要把自己的研究与他人的研究结合起来，哪些与他人的研究相似，哪些不一样。从自己的研究结果可以得出什么样的结论或推论。要从研究结果可以引申一些相关的内容，不要完全局限于自己的研究领域，放宽一些。
5. 我一般是在写完这些部分以后，再写Abstract，最后再定标题。一个简洁醒目的标题，事半功倍。 请记住：写文章一定要突出自己研究相对较新的内容。这是一些影响因子较高的期刊所很看重的。 另外，最不推荐的是把文章写成中文，然后翻译成英文。因为这样真的是彻头彻尾的中式英语了。
第二部分：SCI文章的投稿 写好文章后，就要开始投稿了。
1. 选择期刊。 到一个适合自己文章的刊物很重要。个人推荐：先投一个影响因子较高的刊物，如果能被送审，得到一些修改意见，即使被拒，然后修改后再投一个影响因子较低的期刊，希望更大一些。切记：勿一稿多投.
2. 国外的期刊基本都实现了网上投稿。登录该期刊，到投稿需知，也就是“Instructions for Authors”，仔细阅读。
5. 我一般是在写完这些部分以后，再写Abstract，最后再定标题。一个简洁醒目的标题，事半功倍。 请记住：写文章一定要突出自己研究相对较新的内容。这是一些影响因子较高的期刊所很看重的。 另外，最不推荐的是把文章写成中文，然后翻译成英文。因为这样真的是彻头彻尾的中式英语了。
第二部分：SCI文章的投稿 写好文章后，就要开始投稿了。
1. 选择期刊。 到一个适合自己文章的刊物很重要。个人推荐：先投一个影响因子较高的刊物，如果能被送审，得到一些修改意见，即使被拒，然后修改后再投一个影响因子较低的期刊，希望更大一些。切记：勿一稿多投.
2. 国外的期刊基本都实现了网上投稿。登录该期刊，到投稿需知，也就是“Instructions for Authors”，仔细阅读。
3. 根据“Instructions for Authors”，修改自己文章的格式。这是一个比较繁琐的事情。一定要仔细修改格式（语法、词汇方面的错误应该在写作时给解决）。 比如说： 文章一般是要求按以下顺序：标题、作者、通讯方式、Abstract， Key Words， Introduction， Materials and Methods， Results， DIscussion， Acknowledgements， References， Figure Legends， Tables， Figures。 同时要求是2倍行距，图片的像素要求（300dpi），标好每个页面的行号...... 不同的期刊，对于参考文献的安排方式不同。有的按出现顺序排列，有的要求按字母顺序排列，有的要求列出所有的作者，有的要求列出4－5个作者，然后加et al.；要求根据期刊而定。 在投稿前，还要检查文章中一些不太“重要”的部分。
有关写作，个人认为还是广泛阅读！但一定要看英文的，而且不能翻译，就这样看，看多了自然就明白了。写作地道与否，这还要看英语水平，以及阅读量的多少。其实许多文章都有固定句型的，部分句子不会写，可以直接拿人家的句子，语法来套，其实也不失为一种方法。因此平时注意将一些优秀的表达的句子，收集起来，多读几遍，评味一下，自己写的时候自然有感觉了。 一般来说，大部分文章都是按普通的写法，如多用复合句，写得要严谨，定义要清晰，表达的词一定要精确，如show， indicate，suggest等词都有细微差别，需要体会的。另外，句子要变化。语法方面，基本原则是引用别人的都用过去时，abs
有关写作，个人认为还是广泛阅读！但一定要看英文的，而且不能翻译，就这样看，看多了自然就明白了。写作地道与否，这还要看英语水平，以及阅读量的多少。其实许多文章都有固定句型的，部分句子不会写，可以直接拿人家的句子，语法来套，其实也不失为一种方法。因此平时注意将一些优秀的表达的句子，收集起来，多读几遍，评味一下，自己写的时候自然有感觉了。 一般来说，大部分文章都是按普通的写法，如多用复合句，写得要严谨，定义要清晰，表达的词一定要精确，如show， indicate，suggest等词都有细微差别，需要体会的。另外，句子要变化。语法方面，基本原则是引用别人的都用过去时，abs
tract， discussion部分也用过去时为宜，文章正文用现在时，当然也可以用过去时，用过去时，表明尊重编辑和读者的意思，不过一般大牛写文章则用现在时，体现自信.
一、投稿信
1. Dear ###:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. ###:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. ###:
一、投稿信
1. Dear ###:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. ###:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. ###:
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on ###（date） but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not,
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on ###（date） but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not,
we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors，
It is more than # weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No:#### ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors，
It is more than # weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No:#### ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in ###. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as >## 4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported # years ago in a reputable journal of -###.
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning ###, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported # years ago in a reputable journal of -###.
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning ###, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table #, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure #. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page #, paragraph # (line #-##) and# (line #-###). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure #. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page #, paragraph # (line #-##) and# (line #-###). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of
brevity rather than an error or omission.
3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “>#”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table #. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.
3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “>#”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table #. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.
10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.
11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures # and # result from a misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.
13. We prefer to retain the use of Table # for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.
15. The running title has been changed to “###”.
16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.
17. The concentration of HAT media (page# paragraph #) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for p
11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures # and # result from a misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.
13. We prefer to retain the use of Table # for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.
15. The running title has been changed to “###”.
16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.
17. The concentration of HAT media (page# paragraph #) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for p
ointing out their error.
18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page#, paragraph #).
19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.
20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure # and #.
21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:
22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.
23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.
24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.
18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page#, paragraph #).
19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.
20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure # and #.
21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:
22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.
23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.
24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.
25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.
submitting投稿的时候我们会看到很多状态，各种状态解释如下：
1. Submitted to Journal 这是投稿时显示的第一个状态，也是系统生成的，说明你的稿件已经上传到编辑部。
2. With editor 这种状态代表编辑已经看到你的投稿件的信息，在此要考虑应该让谁来审理你的稿件。
3. Under review（with editor）
这种状态代表稿件在审稿人那里，正在审阅。但是如果审稿人对此文章不了解不想审，就会退给编辑，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。
4. required review completed 这种状态代表审稿结束，等编辑处理接受与否。
5. Minor revision/Major revision 这种状态代表审稿人做出的决定让你对论文进行小修改或者需要大修文章。
6. Revision Submitted to Journal 这是要求修改稿送给编辑，重复以上状态。但是有可能
submitting投稿的时候我们会看到很多状态，各种状态解释如下：
1. Submitted to Journal 这是投稿时显示的第一个状态，也是系统生成的，说明你的稿件已经上传到编辑部。
2. With editor 这种状态代表编辑已经看到你的投稿件的信息，在此要考虑应该让谁来审理你的稿件。
3. Under review（with editor）
这种状态代表稿件在审稿人那里，正在审阅。但是如果审稿人对此文章不了解不想审，就会退给编辑，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。
4. required review completed 这种状态代表审稿结束，等编辑处理接受与否。
5. Minor revision/Major revision 这种状态代表审稿人做出的决定让你对论文进行小修改或者需要大修文章。
6. Revision Submitted to Journal 这是要求修改稿送给编辑，重复以上状态。但是有可能
也不重复，如果审稿人给你提的问题都是无关紧要的问题，那么编辑回自己做出最后接受的决定，不会再分配给审稿人。
7. rejected 代表论文被拒绝了，很可惜，论文不适合该期刊，或者自己写的论文太差。
7. rejected 代表论文被拒绝了，很可惜，论文不适合该期刊，或者自己写的论文太差。
版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。
发表评论