AfPS GS2019:01PAK
Product Safety Commission(AfPS)
accessible是什么意思中文产品安全委员会（AfPS）
GS Specification Testing and assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons(PAHs)
多环芳烃(PAHs）的GS规范测试和评价
in the awarding of GS Marks-Specification pursuant to Article21
(1)No.3of the Product Safety Act(ProdSG)
在授予GS标志时-根据产品安全法（ProdSG）的第21(1)条的
No.3的规范
-AfPS GS2019:01PAK
Date of issue:15May2019
发行日期：2019年5月15日
Management:
部门：Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
联邦职业安全与健康研究所
Table of Contents目录
Preliminary observations初步观察
1Purpose/Intention目的/意图
2Basics基本原理
3Procedure过程
3.1Risk assessment风险评估
3.2Categorisation分类
3.3Test and Assessment测试和评估
4Transitional regulations/periods过渡性法规/时期
4.1GS mark certificates,issued from1July2020onwards
GS标志证书，自2020年7月1日后颁发
4.2GS mark certificates,issued before1July2020
GS标志证书，在2020年7月1日之前颁发
Annex:Test附件：试验
Instructions说明
1Aim and purpose目标和目的
2Procedure过程
2.1Brief description简要说明
2.2Equipment设备
2.3Chemicals and solutions化学品和溶液
3Preparation and measurement准备和测试
3.1Sample preparation样品制备
3.2Measuring procedure测量程序
3.3Special characteristcs特殊特征
Annex:Gas-chromatographic conditions(informative)
附件：气相谱法条件（提供有用信息的）
Testing and assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in
the awarding of GS marks
在GS认证中多环芳烃（PAHs）的测试和评估
Preliminary observations初步观察
On4August2014the Product Safety Commission(AfPS)has determined the requirements of PAH testing in the awarding of the GS mark as specification according to Article21(1)No.3of the Product Safety Act(ProdSG).
2014年8月4日，产品安全委员会（AfPS）根据《产品安全法》（ProdSG）第21(1)No.3条，在授予GS标志时确定了PAH测试的要求
On15May2019the requirements were reviewed and revised.The GS specification AfPS GS2014:01PAK shall be replaced by this document.The implementation is achieved by means of this PAH document.
2019年5月15日，我们对这些要求进行了审查和修订。GS规范AfPS GS2014：01PAK应由本文件取代。这个实现是通过这个PAH文件来实现的。
1Purpose/Intention目的和意图
A GS mark may be awarded only if the prerequisites of Article21(1)of the Product Safety Act are fulfilled.Above all,GS certified he examined type in sense of Article21(1)sentence1of the ProdSG(Product Safety Act),shall comply with the essential requirements set out in Article3,and in case of consumer products, the additional requirements set out in Article6of the ProdSG.
只有在满足《产品安全法》第21(1)条的先决条件时，才能授予GS标志。最重要的是，GS认证产品，即ProdSG（产品安全法）第21条第1(1)款的检验类型，应符合第3条规定的基本要求，对于消费品，应符合ProdSG第6条规定的附加要求。
Based on the general clauses(especially Article3(1)No.2and Article3(2)sentence 1of the ProdSG),the GS body is obliged to identify and evaluate known risks to health during a risk assessment.In addition to the ProdSG the GS body must consider also other applicable legal provisions such as the Chemicals Prohibition Ordinance (ChemVerbotsV)or the Articles30,31of the German Food and Feed Code(LFGB) or the REACH Regulation(EC)No1907/2006,especially Annex XVII.
基于一般条款（特别是ProdSG法案的第3(1)条的No.2和第3(2)条的第1句），GS机构有义务在风险评估期间识别和评估已知的健康风险。除ProdSG提案外，GS机构还必须考虑其他适用的法律规定，如禁止化学品的条例（ChemVerbotsV）或德国食品和饲料法（LFGB）的第30、31条或REACH法规(EC)No1907/2006，尤其是附件十七。
This document and,in particular,the testing instructions(Annexe)specify the requirements with respect to the contents of PAHs in products.Furthermore,the methodology for the evaluation by GS bodies is harmonised.
本文件，特别是测试说明（附录），规定了关于产品中多环芳烃含量的要求。此外，由GS机构进行的评估的方法是协调的。
2Basics基本原理
PAH contamination of materials is primarily due to the use of:
材料的多环芳烃污染主要是由于使用：
-PAH contaminated extender oils in rubber and flexible plastics(soft plastics)
-橡胶和柔性塑料（软塑料）中受多环芳烃污染的填充油
-PAH contaminated carbon black as black pigment in rubber,plastics and paints
-受多环芳烃污染的炭黑，如橡胶、塑料和颜料中的黑颜料
-
hydrocarbon solvent naphtha)
-烃类溶剂（例如，轻汽油溶剂）
PAH contamination has previously been detected not only in rubber but also in various types of ABS,PP and in different synthetic fibers,natural latex, paints as well as in materials treated with naphthalene.
多环芳烃污染以前不仅在橡胶中，而且在各种类型的塑料中也被检测到，如ABS、PP和不同的合成纤维、天然乳胶、涂料以及用萘处理的材料中。
3Procedure过程
The GS body must take into account the following steps both in the process of awarding a new GS mark and within the framework of monitoring existing GS mark certificates:
在授予一个新的GS标志的过程中，以及在监督现有的GS标志证书的框架内，该机构必须考虑到以下步骤：
1.Risk assessment风险评估
2.Categorisation分类
3.Test and evaluation试验与评估
3.1Risk assessment风险评估
The GS body must carry out a risk assessment and,in doing so,lay down which relevant contact/grip and operating surfaces of the product are to be considered for testing and which are not.And these shall be documented(this means that the GS body must first specify the contact/grip and operating areas,to which the requirements of the PAH document must be applied(specification of PAH relevance)). The risk assessment can be suspended with,where appropriate,if the respective Erfahrungsaustauschkreis(“Exchange of Experience Forum”,EK)has already defined a procedure for the product or product group regarding the contact/grip and operating surfaces to be tested.A reference to the EK’s definition shall be included in the documentation accordingly.
GS机构必须进行风险评估，在这种情况下，规定考虑产品的哪些相关接触点和接触面需要测试和哪些不需要测试，这些应被记录（这意味着GS机构必须首先指定接触点和接触面，必须适用PAH文件的要求（PAH相关规范））。如果各自的经验交流圈（“经验交流论坛”，EK）已经为产品或产品组定义了关于要测试的接触点和接触面的程序，则可以暂停风险评估。相关文件中应参考EK的定义。
Materials that cannot be accessed or that can only be accessed using tools need not be considered,with the exception of samples with a conspicuous odour.Components that are rarely and only briefly accessible to the user during simple maintenance or expansion work do not need to be considered.
不能接触或只能使用工具接触的材料不需要考虑，除了样品有明显的气味。在简单的维护或扩展工作中，不需要考虑用户很少且只能短暂接触的组件。
In principle,account must be taken of all contact/grip and operating surfaces that can come into direct contact with the skin or that can be put into the mouth(in the latter case regardless of accessibility)during intended or reasonable foreseeable use(but not misuse).1
原则上，在预期或合理的可预见的使用（但不包括误用）期间，必须考虑到可与皮肤直接接触或可放入口腔（在后一种情况下，无论可接触性如何）的所有接触点和接触面。1
1However,in order to ensure a consistent and appropriate procedure during the awarding of GS marks,it is not generally necessary to analyse all freely accessible surfaces.The intention of this document is that only relevant contact/grip and operating surfaces are to be considered.It is not expedient to test all product parts or surfaces in order“to be on the safe side”.
1然而，为了确保在授予认证期间有一个一致和适当的程序，一般没有必要分析所有可自由接触的表面。本文件的目的是只考虑相关的接触点和接触面。测试所有产品部件或表面并不是为了“安全”
3.2Categorisation分类
Depending on the results of the risk assessment,the corresponding product parts are then to be categorised(see Table1)and their actual PAH contents are to be analysed according to the analysis method as mentioned below.Existing test reports can be taken into account subject to compliance with the Grundsatzbeschluss(“principle decision”)ZEK-GB-2012-01rev.1of the ZEK(“Central Exchange of Experience Forum”)and the requirements of this PAH document.Categorisation can be dispensed with if the respective Erfahrungsaustauschkreis(“Exchange of Experience Forum”, EK)has already defined a categorisation of the contact/grip and operating surfaces for a product or group of products.
根据风险评估的结果，然后对相应的产品部件进行分类（见表1），并按照以下分析方法对其实际多环芳烃含量进行分析。现有测试报告原则（“原则决定”）上应符合ZEK（“中央经验交流论坛”）的标准ZEK-GB-2012-01版本1和本PAH 文件的要求。如果各自的经验交流圈（“经验交流论坛”，EK）已经定义了一个产品或一组产品的接触点和接触面的分类，则可以取消分类。
Table1presents the maximum limits of PAH in materials of products,which shall not be exceeded.
表1显示了产品材料中多环芳烃的最大限度，不得超过。
The provisions of this document regarding the PAH contents are not applicable,if in other legal provisions corresponding or further stricter requirements for the PAH content are provided.This applies only to the material,component,or component group but not to the integral product as a whole.Materials and parts of the product that are not covered by other legislative provisions must be assessed within the framework of the procedure for awarding the GS mark in accordance with the requirements of this PAH document.2
如果在其他法律规定中对PAH内容提供了相应的或更严格的要求，则本文件中关于PAH内容的规定不适用。这只适用于材料、零件或零件组，而不适用于整体产品。在按照本PAH文件的要求授予GS标志的程序框架内，不在其他立法规定之内的产品材料和部件，必须按照本PAH文件的要求进行评估。2
It must be ensured that for each single PAH component the limit of quantification of 0.2mg/kg can be actually achieved with the test procedure.
必须确保对于采用试验程序每个单一的多环芳烃组分的定量限可以达到0.2mg/kg。
Meanwhile the influences of the procedure and the matrix,as well as measurement uncertainty and efficiency of extraction but also losses during purification must be

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。