摘要
章太炎是晚清民国学术大师，他一生勤学著述，留下了一系列极具学术价值的研究论著，其学术涉猎之广，学术功力之深厚让后人叹为观止。章太炎治学宗法乾嘉学派，以小学为根基，以考证为方法，辨章源流，追根溯源，力求还原历史文化的真相。桐城派是清代最大的散文流派，历时二百余年，声势浩大，直至五四时期渐渐消亡。桐城派推崇宋明理学，古文习韩、柳，文章以古体散文为主，其中以戴名世为流派奠基人，方苞、姚鼐以及刘大櫆被称为“桐城三祖”。流派中的文人提出了一系列古文理论，相互之间既有承接，又有不同程度的嬗变，在中国文学批评史上留下了浓墨重彩的一笔。任何一个从晚清走来的学人都无法避免对桐城派的讨论研究，章太炎作为国学大师，自是在此之列。虽然章太炎与桐城派分属不同流派，但二者之间仍有诸多关联。事实上，二者之间的关系犹如丝织绳线，相互缠绕、相互影响。章太炎是乾嘉后学，桐城派是程朱理学的承载者，两者之间的交织即是在影射清代汉宋之争。本文主要从四个方面展开论述，分别为：第一部分考察章太炎与桐城派的社会关联，为二者的整体研究寻历史依据；第二部分探索两者的文论关联，从他们的文论交汇中尝试思考古文创作之正义；第三部分对比二者的复古理念，再现章太炎与桐城派的复古交织；第四部分思考章太炎与桐城派研究的当代意义，尝试寻学人与学派研究的价值。通过建构这四部分内容，力求较为系统化地呈现出章太炎与桐城派研究的整体概貌。本文认为章太炎虽然推崇魏晋文风，但亦受到桐城派的影响，所以他的文学理念集汉宋于一体。他对桐城派古文的批评整体上较为辩证，但其中批判桐城派文章“非发乎情”则是谬误之处。与此同时，章太炎在复古上取得
了卓越的成就，而桐城派收效甚微，主要因为章氏积极吸收各家文化为己所用。通过学人与学派的关联研究可以尝试寻新时代“新”与“旧”衔接的基本路径。
关键词：章太炎桐城派社会关联文论关联复古
Abstract
Zhang taiyan was an academic master in the late qing dynasty and the republic of China.He devoted his whole life to learning and writing,leaving behind a series of research works of great academic value.Zhang taiyan,as a relic of the late qing dynasty,studied the patriarchal clan system of the qianjia school,taking primary school as the foundation,taking textual research as the method,distinguishing the source of the chapter,tracing back to the source,and striving to restore the truth of history and culture.
The tongcheng school was the largest literature school in the qing dynasty,which lasted for more than two hundred years and was popular until the May4th movement died out gradually.Tongcheng school,promote neo-confucianism GuWen study han, liu,the article is given priority to with archaic prose,including dai ming-shi,for school founder,Fang Bao,Yao Nai and liu dakui is referred to as"tongcheng three generations".The scholar in the school put forward a series of ancient literary theor
ies, which not only inherited from each other,but also changed to different degrees,which left a profound and brilliant mark in the history of Chinese literary criticism.Any scholar who came from the late qing dynasty could not avoid the discussion and study of tongcheng school.Zhang taiyan,as a master of sinology,was among them. Although zhang taiyan and tongcheng school belong to different schools,there are still many connections between them.In fact,the relationship between the two is like a silk woven rope.Zhang taiyan was a post-scholar of qianjia,and tongcheng school was the carrier of cheng zhu's neo-confucianism.This paper mainly discusses from four aspects,which are as follows:the first part investigates the social connection between zhang taiyan and tongcheng school,and looks for historical basis for the overall study of them;The second part explores the relationship between the two literary theories and tries to think about the justice of ancient Chinese literary creation from the intersection of their literary theories.The third part compares the two retro concepts and reproduces the interweaving of zhang taiyan and tongcheng school.The fourth part considers the contemporary significance of zhang taiyan and tongcheng school,and tries to find the value of scholars and schools.Through the construction of these four parts,we try to present a more systematic study of zhang taiyan and
tongcheng school.This paper argues that although zhang taiyan advocated the style of wei and jin,he
was also influenced by tongcheng school,so his literary ideas were integrated with han and song dynasties.His criticism of the ancient writings of tongcheng school is generally dialectical,but zhang's criticism of the writings of tongcheng school is fallacious.At the same time,zhang taiyan made remarkable achievements in restoring ancient ways,while tongcheng school had little effect, mainly because zhang shi actively absorbed various cultures for his own use.Through the study of the relationship between scholars and schools,we can try to find the basic path to connect the"new"and"old"in the new era.
Keywords:zhang taiyan,tongcheng school,social relevance,literary theory, relevance to retro
目录
摘要 (Ⅰ)
目录 (Ⅲ)
1绪论 (1)
1.1选题背景 (1)
1.2国内外研究现状评述 (2)
1.3研究意义 (7)
1.4研究思路与研究方法 (8)
1.5研究重点、难点与预期创新点 (9)
2章太炎与桐城派社会关联考论 (10)
2.1地域关联 (10)
2.2章太炎师承与桐城派的关联 (13)
2.3章太炎与后期桐城派文人的社会交往 (17)
3章太炎与桐城派的文论关联（上） (23)
3.1古文之“气”论 (23)
3.2古文之“情”论 (31)
4章太炎与桐城派的文论关联（下） (38)
4.1古文空疏论 (38)
4.2文体分类关联 (45)
5古文派的统一战线：复古 (53)
archaic
5.1章太炎复古理念述略 (53)
5.2桐城派复古理念述略 (57)
5.3国学之存活论：二者复古的交汇与终局的反思 (59)
6章太炎与桐城派研究的当代意义 (64)
6.1古代文学流派之争的终局：融合汇通 (64)
6.2探索新与旧的衔接——以学人与学派的关联研究为引领 (65)
7结论 (67)
参考文献 (68)
附录：章太炎对桐城派的评价源目汇编 (75)
作者简历 (78)
学位论文原创性声明 (79)
学位论文数据集 (80)

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。