统计与决策投稿外审流程
英文回答:
Review Process for Submissions to Statistics and Decision.
The review process for submissions to Statistics and Decision is designed to ensure the quality and rigor of the published work. All submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process, which includes the following steps:
1. Initial Screening: Upon receipt, each submission is screened by the editorial office to ensure that it meets the journal's scope and formatting requirements. Submissions that do not meet these requirements may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected without further review.
2. Peer Review: Submissions that pass the initial screening are assigned to a handling editor, who selects two or more independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant area. The reviewers are asked to evaluate the submission based on its originality, significance, met
hodology, results, and overall contribution to the field.
3. Review Process: The reviewers typically have 4-6 weeks to complete their reviews. They are asked to provide detailed comments on the submission, including both positive and negative feedback. The handling editor considers the reviewers' comments and makes a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief.
4. Editorial Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on whether to accept or reject a submission. The editor may consider the reviewers' comments, the submission's overall quality, and the journal's needs in making this decision.
5. Revisions and Resubmission: Authors whose submissions are conditionally accepted may be asked to revise their work based on the reviewers' comments. Revised submissions are typically re-reviewed by the original reviewers or by a new set of reviewers.
6. Publication: Accepted submissions are typically published online within 2-4 weeks of acceptance. The journal also publishes a print edition on a quarterly basis.
中文回答:
editorinchief是什么意思 统计与决策投稿外审流程。
统计与决策的投稿外审流程旨在确保发表文章的质量和严谨性。所有投稿都经过严格的同行评审流程,包括以下步骤:
1. 初步筛选,收到投稿后,编辑部会进行初步筛选,以确保它符合期刊的范围和格式要求。不满足这些要求的投稿可能会退回给作者进行修改,或直接拒稿。
2. 同行评审,通过初步筛选的投稿会被分配给一位处理编辑,处理编辑会选择两位或两位以上的独立审稿人,他们具有相关领域的专业知识。审稿人会被要求根据投稿的原创性、重要性、方法论、结果和对该领域的总体贡献来评估投稿。
3. 评审流程,审稿人通常有 4-6 周的时间来完成评审。他们会被要求对投稿提供详细的评论,包括积极和消极的反馈。处理编辑会考虑审稿人的评论,并向主编提出建议。
4. 编辑决定,主编对是否接受或拒绝投稿做出最终决定。编辑在做出此决定时可能会考虑审稿人的评论、投稿的整体质量和期刊的需求。
5. 修改和重新提交,被有条件接受的投稿可能会被要求根据审稿人的评论修改其工作。修改后的投稿通常由原始审稿人或一组新审稿人重新审阅。
6. 出版,被接受的投稿通常在被接受后 2-4 周内在线发表。本刊也按季度出版印刷版。
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198,我们将在24小时内删除。
发表评论