.-刘洪波范文

———————————————————————————————— 作者：
———————————————————————————————— 日期：
   
1）Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
写作提纲：
观点：每个人都能起作用。
原因1：环境问题是长期人类活动导致的。
原因2：个人能影响政府和公司的决定。E.g：如果人人不用一次性纸杯，就不会有公司生产。
MODEL ANSWER
用sort outEnvironmental protection is one of the most important challenges almost every country is facing. However, whether only governments and big firms have resources and powers to preserve our environment is a controversial issue. My view is that every single citizen could also make a huge difference.
First, it is clear that it is human activities that have the greatest impact on environment throughout the history. Both environment contamination and conservation are the long-term process, and no single government or big company can meet this challenge alone. So, whoever created the problem should solve it; environment protection needs every one of us to continuously participate in.
Moreover, the public’s wills and behaviors have a critical influence on government’s policies and company’s strategies. For example, if everyone says “no” to plastic shopping bags and paper cups, the companies that manufacture such products will switch to environmental-friendly substitutes in order to survive in the market.
That is not to say that governments and large companies can not positively contribute. Indeed governments can enact laws and introduce programs to raise the public’s low carbon awareness; companies can promote green products to change the public’s consuming habits. But they also indeed every citizen’s appreciation and support to bring good results.
In sum, no effort is too small when we are protecting the environment! Meanwhile, local authorities and organizations must shoulder their responsibility to develop low carbon economy at the macro level. Only by doing so can we assure that we could hand this beautiful planet to our next generation, and the next generation after!
(259 words)
2）Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
写作提纲
观点：人类合理利用动物是正当的。
原因1：自然法则natural law / the law of the jungle
原因2：动物对人类文明贡献大。KFC, McDonald’s, even pets
转折：当然，滥用是不对的。打猎取乐，穿毛皮衣服。
MODEL ANSWER
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about animal protection and animal rights. However, whether we should utilize animals for the human purposes has caused heated debate recently. In my view, it is acceptable to reasonably exploit animals for the benefit of mankind and impossible to completely cut down the human’s dependence on animals.
First, it is clear that human beings are standing at the top of the food chain of this planet. As big fishes eat small ones, mankind uses animals for its own benefits, which is consistent
with the natural law. So, it is hard to state that we are doing wrong by exploiting animals for our interests.

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。