正方陈词：ignore the waste behind youGood morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China we think it’s environment growth should be chosen. I have three reasons to prove this point. First as a developing country the economy power is far behind the developed counties China have one fifth of the people in the world but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. so the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy. Second economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection. we can develop our economy without environment pollution .Third when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protectiontill then it will be a win-win. In a word considering the current situations economy growth should take priority in China.
反方陈词：We agree economic growth is needed. But think about the past decades we followed the old model of “first pollution last treatment” however how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent and some local regions’ environment have been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence. What’s more the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this me
ans it placed us in a completely passive position. At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life urban conservation and the environment. So we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past that is to say in the course of development we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. That’s all I want to say.
自由辩论
正方：We all know that in many places of china like many poor contries where the environment is pretty good there are thousands people Wander in the poverty line，lack of money for the food the need to live， Then opponent debaters do you think we still need to develop our economics?
反方：But opponent debaters can’t ignore a fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present. We have had the ability to help them. On the contrary the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high .
But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. The overcrowded living areas the foul air the impure water the unbearable noise and rush hour traffic all these things have affected the quality of life. We have money but being under the sub health condition. Does it make any sense opponent debaters?
正方：There do exist some estern cities whose economy is quite developed but you forget that China has 1.3 billion people. And In most places the economy is quite backward the eastern cities can’t support all need of Chinese people. We know that environment protection need high-technology High-tech personnel and science research. They all need a lot of money and money is created by economy. I want ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength?
反方：Environmental protection needs economy. But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink polluted water eat the toxic food can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of
economic development to protect the environment. Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?
正方：Opponent debaters have refered the returning farmland to forest policy. We admit our country has pay a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit. But we hold the idea that the ep is an appro.. to ensure our economic develop better. As for the incident why we give up the money 。。。。。
正方总结
反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect which lead to sea-level rises. As a result thousands of coastal dweller have to face the fate of the migration. Moreover the opponent also said” when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want
to question that when the animals and plants have died out what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years we can wait two years to develop it .But if the environmental protection delays two years the species will be extinct the resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. So our side advocate the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you.

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。