Effects of Wafer Bow and Warpage on Performance of Electrostatic Chucks in High Volume Manufacturing
depositionPiotr Kurkowski, Sergei Drizlikh, Roger Sarver, Heath Angis, Patrick Loisel
National Semiconductor Corporation, 5 Foden Road, South Portland, Maine, 04106 USA {Peter.Kurkowski, Sergei.Drizlikh, Roger.Sarver, Heath.Angis, Pat.Loisel}@nsc
Abstract
This paper presents learnings authors gained when dealing with back side pressure faults (BSPF) on 200mm interconnect deposition tools equipped with minimum contact area (MCA) electrostatic chucks (ESC). It was found that BSPF’s occurred more likely on chucks running mostly BiCMOS product. BiCMOS product was four times more susceptible to experience this fault than CMOS due to higher wafer bow and warpage which were traced to recrystallization of backside polysilicon at RTP emitter anneal. Moreover, a cost-effective rework scheme was implemented to prolong the life of ESC’s. Long term solution of reducing wafer bow and warpage process is also being pursued.
Keywords
Electrostatic chuck (ESC), wafer warpage, wafer bow, BiCMOS
INTRODUCTION
In the course of semiconductor process flow silicon wafers develop bow and warpage due to different intrinsic properties of films added or removed to both front and back sides. However, there are process steps that require nearly perfect wafer planarity such as extreme UV photolithography for depth of focus control and deposition and etch tools that require wafer temperature control.
The purpose of an ESC in metal deposition process is to clamp (chuck) down wafers against a back side gas flow which is used for temperature control.
Chucking is achieved using a bipolar ESC which resembles a parallel plate capacitor with one of the plates being the wafer (see Figure 1 and 2). Wafer is first electrostatically flattened and then backside argon is flown at a controlled rate and a desired pressure is expected to build up within a set time.
Figure 1. Actual MCA ESC surface
made by Applied Materials Inc.
BSPF occurs whenever a set point pressure is not reached due to backside argon leakage on wafer sides; halting further processing in the chamber in case of a wafer breakage.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of a bipolar ESC.
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION & INVESTIGATION
While working on reducing the number BSPF occurrences we observed that the frequency of a BSPF was four times higher on BiCMOS than CMOS technology flow. Analyzing the BSPF distribution between metal deposition tools, we discovered that the ESC age and usage are significant factors in BSPF occurrence frequency. However, one question remained: what is different about the two types of product wafers? It was suspected that wafer geometry might be a significant factor. Using ADE’s 9500 UltraGage metrology tool we measured shape and flatness of wafers at metal deposition step. Table 1 reveals that there is a significant difference in planarity between CMOS and BiCMOS types. Wafers on BiCMOS process flow had much higher bow (more convex) and warpage.
Table 1. BiCMOS has significantly higher non-planarity compared to CMOS product wafers.
Bow (µm) Warpage (µm) CMOS 20 45 BiCMOS 46
112
To identify which process step is responsible for inducing excessive wafer bow/warpage on BiCMOS flow, we measured these parameters at various key process steps.
Figure 3. BiCMOS warpage as measured at various process steps.
The emitter anneal step is the responsible step (see Figure 3). Since the wafer at this step has amorphous silicon on the back side and the anneal is over 900 deg C we suspect that the recrystallization of the silicon is the root cause for excessive bow/warpage [1].
Furthermore, our investigation revealed that BSPF are confined to certain ESC’s. Following vendor recommendation, we used upside down wafer particle scan to diagnose how well a test wafer is pulled flat against the ESC surface. The map generated from frequently aborting ESC was compared against a healthy ESC. As can be seen in Figure 4, the aborting ESC has missing rings of contact pads while the healthy ESC has full pad pattern.
Figure 4. Left, worn ESC MCA pads with frequent
BSPF’s. Right, healthy ESC with no BSPF’s.
CONTAINMENT
The initial containment involved trying to With upside down test serving as a visual indicator of chucking strength along with the associated frequency of faults, worst e-chucks were identified. The next step was to use in-house automation systems to route BiCMOS WIP to chambers not suffering from BSPF’s. Lastly, authors implemented a cost-effective method to rework worn ESC’s thus offsetting the need to purchase new ones. At 1/5th the cost of a new chuck this amounts to significant savings.
The actual rework procedure consists of stripping the old MCA pads and redepositing new ones provided that the ESC does not suffer from other defects. Moreover, the refurbished ESC’s had their
pad count doubled to decrease the rate of wear. These measures immediately decreased the frequency of the pressure faults (see Figure 5), which in turn, reduced product scrap, tool down time and the need for engineering intervention.
Figure 5. Normalized Pareto plot of tool recovery faults
during three consecutive periods.
BACKSIDE FILM INVESTIGATION
With initial investigation pointing toward the increase in the crystalline order of the backside film(s) during emitter anneal as the most significant source of wafer warpage on BiCMOS process flow, we measured warp trend for different backside films. We found that the furnace deposition of amorphous polysilicon, which inevitably occurs on both sides of a wafer, and its subsequent RTP anneal induce the greatest amount warpage as seen in Figure 6. Since low warpage is highly desirable, a new backside polysilicon strip would have to be added to the existing process flow, however, moving an earlier backside strip to post polysilicon deposition is more efficient in this case. Efforts are currently underway to qualify and implement this change in the BiCMOS process flow. Figure 6. Warp trend by process operation for
different backside films.
CONCLUSIONS
National's 200mm fab is a high volume factory with a variety of process technologies. Wear of ESC’s is expected, however, higher than normal amount was observed on ESC’s running predominantly BiCMOS wafers. These ESC’s have a distinctive wear pattern and experience significantly more BSPF’s on BiCMOS wafers which have much higher bow and warpage. This non-planarity was traced to RTP anneal step of backside polysilicon film where our current effort is directed. Faced with demands of manufacturing the authors were able to contain the issue through automated WIP routing and provided a cost-effective method to restore ESC’s to a newer condition. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Jeff Jernigan, section head of Thin Films group, for making the writing of this paper possible. REFERENCES
[1] Campbell, S.A., The Science and Engineering of Microelectronic Fabrication, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2001). AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
Piotr Kurkowski has been with National Semiconductor since 2001 in Thin Films group as a CVD/PVD metallization process engineer.
Sergei Drizlikh has been with National Semiconductor since 2001 in Unit Process Development group as a CVD/PVD metallization process development engineer. Roger Sarver has been with National Semiconductor since 1996 in Thin Films group as a CVD/PVD metallization and RTP equipment engineer.
Heath Angis has been with National Semiconductor since 1999 in Thin Films group as a CVD/PVD metallization equipment engineer.
Patrick Loisel has been with National Semiconductor since 1997 in Process Development/Integration group as a process integration technician.
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198,我们将在24小时内删除。
发表评论